• AWWA WQTC71644
Provide PDF Format

Learn More

AWWA WQTC71644

  • Permeate Quality Comparison of MBR and Tertiary Membrane Filtration
  • Conference Proceeding by American Water Works Association, 11/01/2009
  • Publisher: AWWA

$12.00$24.00


There are two main low-pressure membrane options that can be implemented aspretreatment for reverse osmosis (RO) for reclamation of water. These two options include: treatment ofraw wastewater with a membrane bioreactor (MBR); and, treatment of secondary effluentfrom a conventional activated sludge (CAS) process using tertiary membrane filtration(TMF). One of the most important aspects to consider is thequality of permeate that is produced by these two low-pressure membrane technologies,and this comparison is the focus of this work. Two pilots were operated at a full-scale wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) in Guelph, Canada. The first pilot treated raw wastewater fed to the plant using a MBR.The second pilot drew effluent from the secondary process at the full-scale plant andtreated it using TMF. The paper provides the operational parameters of the two parallel systems. As shown, themembrane components of the treatment systems are very similar; however, the biologicalcomponents of the treatment systems are significantly different. Includes 2 references, tables, figures.

Related Products

AWWA ACE63199

AWWA ACE63199

So Many Projects, So Little Money - How to Build a Capital Program That Your Ratepayers and Decision..

$12.00 $24.00

AWWA WQTC65854

AWWA WQTC65854

Electrolysis of Drinking Water and It's Effect on Microbial Survival..

$12.00 $24.00

AWWA ACE71020

AWWA ACE71020

Two Years of Operation at the Hemet Membrane Filtration Plant..

$12.00 $24.00

AWWA JAW34102

AWWA JAW34102

Journal AWWA - How Strategic is Your Planning?..

$15.00 $30.00